<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sad Hummer by Hedgehog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://listenwithothers.com/2012/09/07/sad-hummer-by-hedgehog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://listenwithothers.com/2012/09/07/sad-hummer-by-hedgehog/</link>
	<description>Are you sitting comfortably? Then we&#039;ll begin.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:52:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: erwinch</title>
		<link>http://listenwithothers.com/2012/09/07/sad-hummer-by-hedgehog/#comment-3387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[erwinch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://listenwithothers.com/?p=5276#comment-3387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry Shirley but I shan’t be blogging this and may have finished for good with LWO having completed five years since May 2007.  I am serious about wanting to spend more time reading and my pile of books to read was not getting any smaller.

Anyway, while I am here I may as well comment on the puzzle.  Perhaps not as difficult as it first looked, my starting point was 18ac (I^(L^S)) which had a unique solution and where L proved to be the misprint.  After that progress was fairly steady as I recall.  This was a brilliant construction but not a favourite with me – I seemed to spend a lot of time making speculative entries and then dreading coming to an impasse.  One notable feature was that the standard preamble instruction that all entries were different was actually required for once – the entry for 27dn could have been 80 or 60 except that 17ac had to be 60.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Shirley but I shan’t be blogging this and may have finished for good with LWO having completed five years since May 2007.  I am serious about wanting to spend more time reading and my pile of books to read was not getting any smaller.</p>
<p>Anyway, while I am here I may as well comment on the puzzle.  Perhaps not as difficult as it first looked, my starting point was 18ac (I^(L^S)) which had a unique solution and where L proved to be the misprint.  After that progress was fairly steady as I recall.  This was a brilliant construction but not a favourite with me – I seemed to spend a lot of time making speculative entries and then dreading coming to an impasse.  One notable feature was that the standard preamble instruction that all entries were different was actually required for once – the entry for 27dn could have been 80 or 60 except that 17ac had to be 60.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
