Listen With Others

Are you sitting comfortably? Then we’ll begin

Posts Tagged ‘Instruction’

Instruction by Oyler

Posted by shirleycurran on 10 Mar 2023

We have just failed to manage a ferocious numerical in the Magpie by Zag and were meaning to give ourselves the long-awaited easy life by ceasing to enter the numerical crosswords or even to attempt them, and here was a Listener numerical by Zag’s mate (they are the co-editors of the Crossnumbers Quarterly). “Let’s go ski-ing and have a break from crosswords!” However, yesterday’s rain has turned our little low-lying resort into a sort of ducks’ paradise and the other Numpty said “It doesn’t look too bad – I’ll have a go”.

Entries went in thick and fast but elation turned to despair as every entry seemed to have several alternatives (I’m told there were 2760 possibilities). This just wasn’t working. I was watching the paper and frustration pile up and just skimmed the clues to see whether Oyler has any hope of retaining his entry to the Listener Oenophile Elite – and of course he has, with all those multiples, I am surprised he is still standing! Cheers Oyler!

However, it seemed it was time to abandon, wax the skis, hunt up some gannex or ventile gear and head for the slush, but it was pretty clear that the message we were to extract from the last digits of down entries was the way in. We fed possible letters into TEA and got gobbledygook from the first seven acrosses RE????E with an odd Q or G thrown in. I persevered and light dawned. The possibilities from the last seven down clues gave ENTRIES. We had to rethink and check our arithmetic to make REVERSE work, but which entries could we reverse? Of course, we had, for example 169 and 961 as possibilities for 3 across, a couple of palindromes and both 1229 and 9221 answering 20 ac. It had to be ACROSS entries.

We did it and checked our new grid, clue by clue, uttering gasps of amazement and delight. Now we understood why 3d was ‘plus or minus 3 – in one grid it was plus, in the other it was minus! What an achievement! And oh, how sneaky – there was a sting in the tail. 174 or 134 would work at 20d. Which to choose? This would snare a careless solver but 31 now appears at 18d so we opt for 71 at 25ac. Fiendish, Oyler but magical!


Posted in Solving Blogs | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Listener No 4751: Instruction by Oyler

Posted by Dave Hennings on 10 Mar 2023

This week, a puzzle from one of the small band of mathematical setters. Two years ago, he presented us with a triangular grid and triangular cells and a proliferation of triangular numbers. This week, a nice square grid with square cells.

Reading the preamble, however, we had MP, DP and DS numbers to calculate. MP was Multiplicative Persistence — try saying that after four pints! Checking in with Wolfram Alpha, I found that it wasn’t just something that Oyler had made up. Similarly, the two lists of numbers, Happy numbers and Lucky numbers, also had a mathematical derivation which, thankfully, Oyler didn’t spell out as he’d have run out of space.

As is my wont, I’ll refrain from a detailed run-through of my solving, but starting at 2dn Palindrome and multiple of 5 with MP of 2 (3), I got 5-5 which led to 1ac Triangular number with a triangular DP (3) being 153, 253 or 351. 23ac Palindromic prime (2) had to be 11 and from 11ac DS equals 21dn (4), 21dn had to be 10, 20 or 30 since 11ac was -5– and therefore a maximum DS of 32. Well, that was all the easy bits!

It should have struck me at some point before the endgame that almost all the entries had at least two alternatives, but heigh-ho it didn’t (and I’m not sure how much it would’ve helped anyway). Fast forwarding to the end, we had to use an innovative coding technique — 1 = A/K/U, 2 = B/I/V, etc. I nearly overlooked a little statement where I had “If 1dn = 12” and led to the instruction (7,6,7) being utter gobbledygook. Luckily I noticed that before going back to square one and 1dn = 38 gave me Reverse across entries.

Thanks for an entertaining and fascinating puzzle, Oyler.

Posted in Solving Blogs | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »